EPL 04/38 (29 Aug 2009)
United 2 Arsenal 1
Rooney p, Diaby og
A draw would probably have been the fair result - Arsenal created more, while United showed the desire and fighting spirit you expect of champions. Instead, United stole the win thanks to Diaby's inexplicable own goal. Then salt was rubbed deep in the Gooners' wounds, with van Persie's apparent last-second equaliser rightly disallowed for Gallas being offside when he set it up, and Wenger sent to the dressing room - with a comedic detour into the Old Trafford stands - for his expressions of frustration.
For United, this game probably came too early in the season, as we're still adjusting to life without Ronaldo, so the three points are even more welcome. It's certainly understandable why Fergie opted for caution and played 4-5-1 to close down Arsenal's space in midfield, but I felt he should have played Rooney wide right instead of Valencia, with Berbatov as the lone striker - Berbatov is a better target man, and he's also shown a willingness to chase back this season.
As for Giggsy's inclusion - well, it was one of those days when he keeps getting the ball in good positions, then making the wrong choice or playing a bad last-ball. He frustratingly wasted several opportunities to put in Rooney or others, but in the end it was still his angled pass that set Rooney on a collision course with Almunia for the penalty. Despite being 36, Giggs also still possesses sufficient speed and mobility to get about in central midfield, and that certainly helped to disrupt Arsenal's passing game.
Indeed, the Gooners' opportunities didn't come from passing their way through our midfield, but rather from defensive lapses or fast breaks, and that was largely due to the efforts of man-of-the-match Darren Fletcher. He was lucky to get away with a tackle on Arshavin that should have been a penalty - he managed to take the Russian's legs as he was shaping to shoot and handle the ball while on the ground at the same time - but the determination with which he made it there for the last-ditch tackle was vintage Keano. Fletch was everywhere throughout the game, harrying and dispossessing Arsenal midfielders constantly, further reinforcing my belief that our season depends as much on him as it does on Rooney.
For me, games against Arsenal seem to have the highest stakes, strangely even more so than those against Liverpool or City, simply because of the recent history of rivalry (at least until Arsenal's drought started), over-the-top acrimony (Pizza-gate, Keano v Vieira in the tunnel) and my particular dislike for Arsene Wenger's blinkered self-righteousness (of which there were more examples in his post-match interview). At the same time, these games are almost always classic showcases of footballing drama (the 1999 FA Cup semi-final replay is still the greatest game I've ever seen), and last night was no exception.
High-flying Hotspurs next...can we bring them back down to earth?
-----
Some Arsenal fans - and Wenger himself - are insisting that Rooney's penalty was the same situation as Eduardo's dive against Celtic in midweek. It's true that Rooney appears to be on his way down or stumbling before Almunia makes contact, but that's only in super slo-mo - in real time, it's a split second and probably Rooney's instinctive tensing up just before Almunia hits him.
And that's really the bottom-line : Rooney's
ankles were clearly hit by Almunia, whereas only the miracle of
WengerVision (tm) reveals any contact between Eduardo and Boruc. Even if it's argued that Rooney was looking for contact, the point is that there was contact, and contact with the player without playing the ball is a penalty, plain and simple. Rooney didn't fabricate any contact, as Almunia's relative lack of protests also demonstrated (as opposed to Boruc's understandable outrage towards Eduardo).
I actually sympathize a little with Wenger's complaints that Eduardo is being singled-out - it is fairly inconsistent with previous incidents to charge him retrospectively. But trying to argue that a clear penalty wasn't a penalty just undercuts his own moral high ground - then again, that's nothing new for the self-confessed master of selective blindness.
Recent Comments